Otklik na esse Okuneva prodolzhaet obsuzhdenie nashey davney shutki ob aktual'nosti nauchnogo issledovaniya i ego rezul'tatov. Protivopostavlyayutsya dva smysla etogo russkogo termina i ego angliyskie ekvivalenty. Smysl «prigodnost', adekvatnost'» sootvetstvuet slovu relevance. Smyslu «kon'yunkturnaya korrektnost'» podoydet slovo topicality. Vsled za Shopengauerom otmechaetsya kratkiy mig torzhestva (ein kurzes Siegesfest) istiny, a takzhe ee sposobnost' «deystvovat' daleko i zhit' dolgo» (die Wahrheit wirkt ferne und lebt lange). Ispol'zuyutsya sformulirovannye Teyyarom de Shardenom kategorii poznaniya ili videniya: centry perspektiv sub'ektov i ob'ektov issledovaniy, ih perepletenie i vzaimnoe preobrazovanie v hode issledovaniya, sovmeschenie issledovatel'skoy tochki zreniya i centra perspektivy s estestvenno vyigryshnoy tochkoy (un point naturellement avantageux) izuchaemogo fenomena, sovpadenie sub'ektivnoy tochki zreniya s ob'ektivnymi konfiguraciyami fenomenov, naibol'shaya polnota ponimaniya dostigaetsya v predel'noy vyigryshnoy tochke - na ostrie vzletayuschey strely evolyucii (fleche montante de l'Evolution). Daetsya interpretaciya kantovskomu imperativu «smey myslit' samostoyatel'no» (sapere aude se sponte) i prepyatstviyam etomu v vide «samomu sebe vvinennoy nezrelosti» (seiner selbst verschuldeten Unmundigkeit). Kantovskaya kritika vozmozhnostey i ogranicheniy razuma pozvolyaet ispol'zovat' eti ogranicheniya dlya sozdaniya novyh vozmozhnostey chelovecheskogo poznaniya i vseh prochih praktik.
relevance as timely validity, topicality as current interest and conjunctural correctness, space-time of phenomena and their study, points-moments of research, horizons of cognition, centers of perspectives, external and internal perspectives, subjects and objects of research, anthropic principle
1. Zaharova E.A. Centr-periferiynye otnosheniya v elektoral'nyh processah: Franciya i Germaniya. M.: Aspekt press, 2025. 240 s
2. Il'in M.V. "Ob'ektivnost'" real'nosti i "sub'ektivnost'" deystvitel'nosti. Kratkiy kommentariy k stat'yam M. Vebera i K. Palonena // METOD: Moskovskiy ezhegodnik trudov iz obschestvovedcheskih disciplin. 2010. № 1. S. 434-437. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PJWTEZ
3. Il'in M.V. Mezhdu veschami i smyslami: Osnovaniya koncept-analiza // Principy i napravleniya politicheskih issledovaniy. M.: ROSSPEN, 2002. S. 161-183
4. Il'in M.V. Fenomen politicheskogo vremeni // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 3. S. 5-20. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HSOEUL
5. Il'in M.V. Modeli svertyvaniya i razvertyvaniya vo vseobschey evolyucii mirozdaniya // METOD: Moskovskiy ezhekvartal'nik trudov iz obschestvovedcheskih disciplin. 2023. Vyp. 13. T. 3. № 4. S. 174-209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31249/metod/2023.04.10 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BYLHDG
6. Il'in M.V. Fundamental'nyy vyzov. Upuscheny li vozmozhnosti politicheskoy nauki? // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2024. № 2. S. 8-24. https://d0i.0rg/. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.02.02 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AOJEQK
7. Kruglov A.N. O ponyatii kritiki i o kriticheskom metode u Kanta // Filosofiya. Zhurnal vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2023. T. 7. № 2. S. 225-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-8719-2023-2-225-260; EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RQWUPG
8. Rokkan C. Centr-periferiynaya polyarnost' // Politicheskaya nauka. 2006. №. 4. S. 73-101. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HVPRMR
9. Araujo D. et al. (2019), The empowering variability of affordances of nature: Why do exercisers feel better after performing the same exercise in natural environments than in indoor environments?, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 138-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.020
10. Blin F. (2016), The theory of affordances // Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications,eds. Caws C., Hamel M.-J., Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 41-64.
11. Costall A. (1995), Socializing affordances // Theory & Psychology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 467-481.
12. Covarrubias P. et al. (2017), The ecological revolution: The senses considered as perceptual systems, 50 Years Later, part 2, Ecological Psychology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 161-164.
13. De Gregorio G.A. et al. (2022), Affordances y ciencia cognitiva: Introduccion, teorfa y aplicaciones, Madrid: Tecnos, 509 p.
14. Gibson J.J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boulder, CO: Taylor & Francis, 346 p.
15. Heras-Escribano M. (2020), The evolutionary role of affordances: ecological psychology, niche construction, and natural selection, Biology & Philosophy, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1-27.
16. Heras-Escribano M., De Pinedo-Garcfa M. (2018), Affordances and landscapes: Overcoming the nature-culture dichotomy through niche construction theory, Frontiers in psychology, vol. 8, article 2294.
17. Hirota R., Saigo H., Taguchi S. (2024), Reality of Affordances: A Category-Theoretic Approach, ALIFE 2024: Proceedings of the 2024 Artificial Life Conference, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Paper No: isal_a_00805, 71; 10 P.
18. Hoffmeyer J. (1998), Surfaces inside surfaces. On the origin of agency and life, Cybernetics & Human Knowing, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33-42.
19. Pyysiainen J. (2021), Sociocultural affordances and enactment of agency: A transactional view, Theory & psychology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 491-512.
20. Rietveld E., Kiverstein J. (2014), A rich landscape of affordances, Ecological psychology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 325-352.
21. Rokkan S. et al. (1987a), Center periphery structures in Europe: an ISSC workbook in comparative analysis, Frankfurt a. M.; N.Y.: Campus Verlag, 1987, 483 p.
22. Rokkan S. The center-periphery polarity (19876), Center periphery structures in Europe: an ISSC workbook in comparative analysis, Frankfurt a. M.; NY.: Campus Verlag, pp. 17-50.
23. Schopenhauer A. (1819), Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung, Erster Band, Leipzig: Brockhaus, XVI S. + 725 p.
24. Teilhard de Chardin P. (1956), Le Phenomene Humain, Paris: Editions du Seuil, 348 p.
25. Wells A.J. (2002), Gibson's affordances and Turing's theory of computation, Ecological psychology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 140-180.
26. Withagen R. et al. (2012), Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency, New ideas in psychology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 250-258.
