EVALUATING CONTIGUOUS ALTERNATIVES IN DECISION-MAKING MODELS USING PYTHON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE
Rubrics: AD HOC
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Python programming language allows for storing and processing information about neighboring geographic objects compared by political actors. The most suitable open-source recent libraries for analyzing and predicting movements along a coordinate plane or adjacency graph (for example, in rational choice studies, diffusion of innovations and shaping institutions or relocation to an already reshaped institutional environment) are presumably Helipad and Mesa.;Actors’ «digital twins» access information about their neighborhoods (encoded explicitly or derived from a polygon’s coordinates) when interacting with the environment: by limiting the number of alternatives for displacement or allocation at the next moment (during a step-by-step simulation) to a list of nearby places.;When choosing the optimal location, computer models compare the relevant characteristics of neighboring objects, focusing on encoded preferences. To that end an actor automatically calculates the utility it would have received by the end of the period thanks to the envisaged zone’s properties, and the most acceptable nearby alternative is determined. Some libraries contain ready-made procedures visualizing the territories and the space they form (as a heat map - with areas’ colors depending on the value of any parameter). By reformulating the research task (by shifting the emphasis from the territories’ characteristics to the properties of moving in various directions), one could use libraries based on game theory. Algorithms to compare strategies (relocating to neighboring areas) are provided in libraries Axelrod, QuantEcon, StratPy, NashPy, OpenSpiel.

Keywords:
agent-based modeling, contiguity matrix, game theory, optimization methods, preferences
Text
Text (RU) (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Axelrod R. (1997), The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 248 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822300

2. Zhang J. (2011), Tipping and residential segregation: A unified schelling model, Journal of Regional Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 167-193.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?